Diazinon and Chlorpyrifos as Urban
Stormwater Runoff Associated Pollutants:
Summary of Issues
G. Fred Lee, PhD, PE, DEE and Anne Jones-Lee, PhD
G. Fred Lee & Associates
El Macero, CA 95618
Review Water Quality Issues Associated with Urban Use of the Organophosphate Pesticides, Diazinon and Chlorpyrifos, That Leads to Urban Stormwater Runoff's Toxicity
Based on "Aquatic Life Toxicity in Stormwater Runoff to Upper Newport Bay, Orange County, California: Initial Results," Report G. Fred Lee & Associates, June 1997.
Urban Stormwater Runoff Toxicity
Urban Stormwater Runoff in Several Areas of California, Texas and Other Areas Has Been Found to Be Toxic to Some Zooplankton Such as Ceriodaphnia
Toxicity Due in Part to Diazinon and Chlorpyrifos
* Under-Regulated Chemicals in Stormwater Runoff
** Diazinon - No US EPA Water Quality Criterion
** Chlorpyrifos - US EPA Water Quality Criterion - Not Enforced
US EPA FIFRA (Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act) Registration of Diazinon Has Not Properly Evaluated Stormwater Runoff Water Quality Impacts
Examples of Urban Stormwater Runoff Toxicity
Orange County, California:
San Diego Creek as It Enters Upper Newport Bay Had 8 to 10 Units of Ceriodaphnia Toxicity Associated with Stormwater Runoff in October-November 1996
* 50% of Toxicity Due to Diazinon and Chlorpyrifos
* Other 50% Due to Unknown Causes
San Francisco Bay Region: Urban Creeks Contain Ceriodaphnia Toxicity Due to Diazinon
* Some Street Gutters in Alameda County, California Residential Areas Contain >2,000 ng/L Diazinon
Central Valley, California: Stormwater Runoff from Urban Areas Is Toxic to Ceriodaphnia Due to Diazinon and Chlorpyrifos
Fort Worth, Texas: Urban Stormwater Runoff Toxic to Ceriodaphnia Due to Diazinon
Diazinon and Chlorpyrifos Toxicity
|Cal Fish and Game-Recommended Water Quality Criteria|
|Ceriodaphnia LC 50||4-day Average||1-hr Average|
|Diazinon||500 ng/L||40 ng/L (freshwater)||80 ng/L|
|Chlorpyrifos||100 ng/L||20 ng/L (freshwater)
10 ng/L (salt water)
Highly Toxic to Some Zooplankton Such as Daphnids and Benthic Organisms Such as Amphipods
Not Highly Toxic to Fish and Many Other Forms of Aquatic Life
Diazinon and Chlorpyrifos Use
Diazinon and Chlorpyrifos Widely Used by Commercial Applicators and Homeowners/Renters to Control Structural and Landscape Pests Including Termites, Ants, Fleas, Grubs, Beetles, Spiders, Chiggers, Earwigs, Silverfish, Cockroaches, Grasshoppers, Etc.
Orange County, California: 100,000 Pounds of Chlorpyrifos and Diazinon Used in Urban Areas in 1995
* About 2 lb/yr in Stormwater Runoff Causes Ceriodaphnia Toxicity
Santa Clara County, California: 123,000 lb Chlorpyrifos and Diazinon Used in 1994
Persistence of Diazinon and Chlorpyrifos
Diazinon - "40 Days"
Chlorpyrifos - "30 Days"
Malathion - "1 Day"
Persistence Sufficient to Cause Ceriodaphnia Toxicity Associated with Urban Stormwater Runoff
* Site-Specific Evaluation for Soil, Water, and Sediments Needed to Evaluate Persistence at a Particular Location
** Dependent upon pH, Temperature, Moisture, Formulation, Other Factors
Sediment Quality Issues
Chlorpyrifos Tends to Sorb to Organic Carbon in Sediments
* Water Solubility 0.4 mg/L
* Found in Upper Bay Sediments of Upper Newport Bay, California near Where San Diego Creek Enters the Bay
** Toxicity in Sediments Unknown
Diazinon Reported to Not Sorb to Sediments - Water Solubility 60 mg/L
* Found in Urban Creek Sediments in San Francisco Bay Area
** Sorbed? Toxic? - Sediments as a Buffer Source of Diazinon to Creek After Stormwater Runoff Event?
High Toxicity to Amphipods - May Be Cause of Unexplained Sediment Toxicity
* Issue Needs to Be Examined for Water Quality Significance
Agricultural Use As a Source of Diazinon for
Urban Area Stormwater Runoff
Application of Diazinon as an Orchard Dormant Spray in the Sacramento and San Joaquin Valleys, CA Causes Rainfall and Fogfall to Be Toxic to Ceriodaphnia in Many Areas at Considerable Distances from Application
* Airborne Transport
** Rainfall in Central Valley, CA after Dormant Spray Application Can Contain over 5,000 ng/L Diazinon - Toxic Level 500 ng/L
* Toxic Pulses of Diazinon Lasting Several Weeks Pass through San Joaquin and Sacramento
Rivers and Delta into Upper San Francisco Bay Each Winter
** Likely Adverse to River and Delta Aquatic Life-Related Beneficial Uses
** Due to Toxicity Magnitude and Persistence
* Agricultural Use of Diazinon as Dormant Spray Also Causes Urban Areas and Highway Stormwater Runoff to Be Toxic to Ceriodaphnia
Alameda County, CA Found Local Airborne Transport as Part of Home Use
Regulatory Requirements for Control of
Diazinon and Chlorpyrifos Toxicity
POTW's and Industrial Wastewater Discharge
* No Acute Toxicity in Discharge/Mixing Zone
* No Chronic Toxicity at Edge of Mixing Zone
NPDES Permitted Urban Area Stormwater Runoff Dischargers
* Control Pollution of Receiving Waters for Stormwater Runoff to Maximum Extent Practicable Using Best Management Practices
* Pollution Defined as Impairment of Designated Beneficial Uses
** Could Require Protection of All Desirable Forms of Fish and Aquatic Life
* Agriculture - No NPDES Permit Required
** General Requirement of No Ambient Water Toxicity - Not Enforced
Control of Diazinon and Chlorpyrifos Toxicity
Small Amounts of Diazinon and Chlorpyrifos Use Responsible for Stormwater Runoff Toxicity
* Orange County, California: about 2 lbs Out of the Estimated 20,000 lbs Used Annually Caused Toxicity in San Diego Creek
** Toxicity Likely Difficult to Control
Need Detailed Forensic Studies of Sources of Toxicity and Toxic Components in Urban Area Stormwater Runoff
When Sources of Toxicity and Toxic Components Known, Examine Uses That Lead to Stormwater Runoff Caused Toxicity
* Forensic Studies Should Be Funded by Pesticide Manufacturers, Formulators, Commercial Applicators, and Users
Development of Diazinon and Chlorpyrifos
Toxicity Control Strategy
If Diazinon and Chlorpyrifos Causes Toxicity to or Impacts Several Types of Zooplankton and/or Fish Larvae, Require Control of Toxic Constituents to Eliminate Toxicity
Diazinon and Chlorpyrifos Apparently Toxic to Limited Number of Types of Zooplankton and Benthic Organisms
* Additional Study Needed to Determine Water Quality Significance of Toxicity to Fisheries-Related Beneficial Uses of Concern to Public
* Diazinon and Chlorpyrifos Are of Significant Value to Public for Pest Control
Determine Water Quality Significance of Toxicity
* Urban Streams - Cannot Assume Toxicity Significant to Water Quality
* Receiving Waters for Urban Streams and Stormwater Runoff
** Rivers, Bays, Lakes, Ponds, Wetlands, Estuaries and Ocean
* Assess Whether Toxicity Significantly Adversely Impacts Numbers, Types, or Characteristics of Desirable Forms of Aquatic Life
* Determine Significance of Toxicity through Use of Best Professional Judgement, Non-Numeric Weight-of-Evidence Evaluation Based on:
** Magnitude, Fate/Persistence, Duration of Aquatic Life Exposure, Transport Time in Creek, River and Bay/Lake Plumes, Type of Organisms Impacted, Importance of Organisms as Component of Food Web for Higher Trophic Level Organisms, Duration of Impact, etc.
Need to Develop Technical Guidance on How to Determine if Toxicity in Specific Waterbody Is Significant to Water Quality
If "Ceriodaphnia" Toxicity Judged Significant - Determine Cause of Toxicity
* Use Guided TIEs, PBO Dilution Series Toxicity Tests, ELISA Analyses, etc.
* Assess Amount of Toxicity Due to Diazinon and Chlorpyrifos
** Use TIEs to Identify Cause of Non-Diazinon and Non-Chlorpyrifos Ceriodaphnia Toxicity
*** Potential Role of Chromium VI - Toxic to Daphnia at <0.5 µg/L
Through Forensic Studies Using Specific Toxic Chemical and Toxicity Measurements at Various Locations in Watershed, Determine Source of Toxicity
* Examine Use/Activity Leading to Toxicity in Runoff Waters from Specific Area
Develop Toxicity and Specific Chemical Control Programs to Reduce and, Where Possible, Eliminate Stormwater Runoff-Associated Toxicity That Is Significantly Adverse to Beneficial Uses of Receiving Waters for Runoff; Options:
* Educate Users on Types and Manner of Use That Lead to Stormwater Runoff-Associated Toxicity
** Need Studies to Define These Conditions
* Restrict Certain Types of Uses That Lead to Urban Area Stormwater Runoff Toxicity
* Reformulate Diazinon and Chlorpyrifos so Their Use Does Not Lead to Significant Stormwater Runoff-Associated Toxicity
* Ban Use of Chlorpyrifos and Diazinon in Areas Where Stormwater Runoff -Associated Toxicity Is Judged to Be Significantly Adverse to Receiving Water Beneficial Uses
Assessment of an Urban Stormwater Runoff
Aquatic Life Toxicity Water Quality Problem
Potential Water Quality Problems Associated with Laboratory-Measured Aquatic Life Toxicity Occur Where the Toxicity Impacts the Numbers, Types and Characteristics of Desirable Forms of Aquatic Life of Concern to the Public
* Regulatory Requirements on Urban Area Street Stormwater Runoff Toxicity Not Definitively Defined
** Control Pollution (Use-Impairment) to Maximum Extent Practicable Using Best Management Practices
* Water Quality Problem Cannot Be Evaluated Solely by Measurement of the Concentration of a Pesticide Such as Diazinon or Ceriodaphnia Toxicity in Standard Toxicity Test
Assessment of an Urban Stormwater Runoff-Caused
Significant Aquatic Life Toxicity Water Quality Problem
Toxicity Impacts Based on a Measured Level of Toxicity for a Sufficient Duration of Exposure to Be Adverse to an Organism
Toxic Conditions Defined by Toxicity - Duration of Exposure Relationship
Each Organism Type, e.g., Ceriodaphnia, Has a Certain Toxic Response - Duration of Exposure Relationship for a Particular Chemical
Toxicity-Duration of Exposure Relationship
Toxicity - Duration of Exposure Relationship
Duration of Exposure Issues
* Are Fish Attracted / Repelled by Water Containing the Toxicant(s)?
** If Repelled - Can They Escape from Toxicant?
* Usually Larval/Sensitive Forms of Fish Are Essentially Planktonic
** Limited Ability to Control Position
* Position Largely Controlled by Water Motion
* May Be Able to "Hide" in Low-Velocity Areas
** Longer Exposure to Toxic Conditions Possible
** Those That "Hide" during Runoff Event May Be Important to Restocking Stream/Area
Additional Toxicity - Duration of Exposure Issues
Some Urban Stormwater Runoff Has Been Found to Contain Short-Term, Greatly Elevated Spikes of Toxicity in the First Flush Runoff
* Spikes of Toxicity Last Few Minutes to Few Hours - Could Readily Be Missed by Normal Sampling
* Toxicity Is Not Representative of Average Conditions During Typical First Flush Event
* Water Quality Significance of Toxicity Spikes Unknown
Latent Toxicity Found
* Organisms Exhibit Toxic Effects Several Days after Exposure to Toxic Conditions While Organism in Non-Toxic Waters
* Needs Further Investigation
Assessing Water Quality Significance of Toxicity
Normally Consider Direct Toxicity to Fish and Shellfish, Including Larval Forms, of Water Quality Significance That Requires Control
Also Consider Toxicity to Substantial Parts of Zooplankton Population of Water Quality Significance, That Requires Control
For Ceriodaphnia Toxicity Associated with Urban Area Stormwater Runoff of Short Duration
* Linkage between Water Column & Sediment Toxicity and Significant Water Quality Impacts to Higher Trophic Level Organisms Less Well-Defined
Issue That Must Be Resolved: Does Reduction in Numbers of a Certain Component of Food Web for Limited Period of Time Significantly Adversely Affect Numbers, Types or Characteristics of Desirable Forms of Aquatic Life Such as Game Fish and Shellfish
* Is There Substitute Fish Food That Can Sustain System Populations during Time of Toxic Pulse Impacts Associated with Stormwater Runoff Event?
Current Status of Diazinon/Chlorpyrifos Ceriodaphnia Toxicity
in Urban Stormwater Runoff Pollution
Sufficient Concentrations of Diazinon & Chlorpyrifos Found in Stormwater Runoff to Waterbodies, Urban Creeks and Near-Shore Waters of Receiving Waters for Stormwater Runoff to Be Toxic to Ceriodaphnia under Standard Test Conditions
* Potential for Water Quality Problem Exists - Likely Potential Problem Not Confirmed
* Before Significant Efforts Are Made to Develop Use-Restrictions for Diazinon and Chlorpyrifos beyond Good Housekeeping and Conservative Use in Accord with Label, Should Evaluate Whether Critical Toxicity-Duration of Exposure Conditions Exist in Urban Creeks, Ponds, Bays, Lakes, Estuaries and Near-Shore Marine Waters to Result in Potentially Adverse Impacts on Aquatic Life-Related Beneficial Uses
Inadequate Information Available Today to Justifiably Claim That Significant Potential Water Quality Problem Exists Due to Diazinon & Chlorpyrifos in Urban Area Stormwater Runoff
* Likely Will Be Significant Water Quality Problems Due to Diazinon/ Chlorpyrifos Toxicity in Some Urban Area Stormwater Runoff Situations
** Rare or Common?
* Must Conduct Intensive Studies to Develop Needed Information to Evaluate with Best Professional Judgement/Weight-of-Evidence Approach, Whether Significant Toxic Conditions Exist in Various Types of Urban Stormwater Runoff Situations to Confirm That There Is Significant Potential for Water Quality Use-Impairment Due to Stormwater Runoff-Associated Constituents Such as Diazinon and Chlorpyrifos
* Locations at Which Real Water Quality Problems Occur Will Likely Be Limited to Certain Types of Receiving Water Situations
** Those Situations Should Be Defined and Receive Highest Priority for Evaluation
Diazinon & Chlorpyrifos Manufacturers, Formulators, Applicators, and Users Should Fund Independent, Peer-Reviewed Studies to Define Whether Diazinon and Chlorpyrifos Are Potentially Causing Significant Water Quality Impacts - Use-Impairments
* Burden of Proof Should Be on Those Who Wish to Profit from the Use of These Chemicals, Not on Non-Using Public or Environment
* Failure to Adequately Fund Needed Studies Should Result in Use Restrictions
Definition of Significant Water Quality Problem
If Unlimited Funds Were Available to Address Readily Discernable Water Quality Problems, Potential Water Quality Problems, and Other Social Problems, Then Society Could Possibly Determine That Diazinon & Chlorpyrifos Use Should Be Restricted to Control Toxicity in Urban Stormwater Runoff
However, Funds Available for Control of Readily Discernable Water Quality Problems and to Investigate Potential Problems Are Limited, and Diazinon & Chlorpyrifos Are Useful Chemicals to Large Part of Urban Population
Must Evaluate Whether Restricting Use of Diazinon & Chlorpyrifos Is Justified Based on Their Causing Significant Water Quality Problems/Use-Impairments in Receiving Waters for Urban Area Stormwater Runoff
A Determination of Significant Water Quality Problems/Use-Impairment Should Involve Adverse Impacts on the Numbers, Types, and Characteristics of Desirable Forms of Aquatic Life of Concern to Public
* Social Decision - Public Needs to Better Understand Potential Magnitude of Problem to Aquatic Resources of Interest to It
Diazinon and Chlorpyrifos Have Existed in Urban Area Stormwater Runoff and Receiving Water for Many Years
* Therefore, If Problem Is, in Fact, Real for Particular Runoff Situation, Those Receiving Waters Where Problem Could Be Occurring Are Already Degraded
Issue Becomes - What Will the Improvement Be in Beneficial Uses of Receiving Water if Significant Restrictions Are Placed on Use of Diazinon & Chlorpyrifos in Urban Areas?
* Important to Assess Whether Diazinon & Chlorpyrifos Are the Only Toxicants in Stormwater Runoff That Potentially Impact Ceriodaphnia-like Populations
** In San Diego Creek Entering Upper Newport Bay Only about Half of Toxicity to Ceriodaphnia Found in Fall 1996 Was Due to Diazinon & Chlorpyrifos, Remainder of Unknown Cause
* Could Control Diazinon & Chlorpyrifos Toxicity but Not Significantly Improve Receiving Water Beneficial Uses because of:
** Limited Significance of Diazinon & Chlorpyrifos Toxicity to Beneficial Uses
** Residual Toxicity Due to Other Constituents
* Should Always Measure Level of Total Toxicity and Define, as Well as Possible, Its Cause through Appropriate TIEs and, Its Source(s) through Forensic Studies
Issues in Regulation of Diazinon and Chlorpyrifos
Should Use Pesticide in Accord with Label - Conservative Use, Proper Management of Residues
* Need Education on Appropriate Use
Need for Immediate Control of Present Pesticide Use because of Imminent Hazard of Adverse Impacts of Toxicity?
* No. Damage Already Done - New Significant Adverse Impacts Unlikely
* Control New Uses and New Areas of Application Which Could Result in Runoff to Ecologically Sensitive Systems
* Organophosphate Pesticide Toxicity Long-Standing Problem if Real, Significant Problem Exists
* Recommendation: Practice Good Housekeeping and Conservative Use
** Determine if Water Quality Problems/Use-Impairment of Concern to Public Is Occurring That Could Be Controlled if Use Restrictions of Urban Pesticides Were Implemented
Ecological Versus Water Quality Impacts
Ecosystems Resilient to Perturbations
* Some Societally Important Organisms, Such as Fish, May Able to Be Eliminated without Altering Functioning of Ecosystem
Water Quality Related to Beneficial Uses
* Numbers, Types, and Characteristics of Desirable Forms of Aquatic Life
** Includes Adequate Functioning of Ecosystem and Protection of Specific Types of Organisms Such as Game Fish, Endangered Species, etc.
* Includes Body Burdens of Hazardous Chemicals Such as Mercury and PCBs That, While Not Necessarily Adverse to the Aquatic Ecosystem, Are of Concern to the Health of People Who Consume Them
Important to Properly Incorporate Aqueous Environmental Chemistry Into Evaluation of the Water Quality Impacts of Chemicals
* Most Chemicals Exist in a Variety of Chemical Species, Only Some of Which Are Toxic/Available
* Chemical Species Distribution Depends on Physical, Chemical, and Biological Factors
* Many Other Factors, Such as Transport and Mixing That Impact Biological Species Also Impact Chemical Species
Not Chemical Characteristics - Chemical Census
* Often Cannot Infer Water Quality Impacts Based on Chemical Characteristics
* Thermodynamics (Energetics - Position of Equilibrium)
* Kinetics (Rates of Reactions)
* Transport - Advection, Mixing, Diffusion, Turbulence
** Hydrology, Hydraulics, Hydrodynamics
* Must Consider Solution - Dissolved and Particulate Forms
** Suspended and Bedded Sediments
Overall Assessment of
Adequacy of Current Information on
Water Quality Significance of Diazinon/Chlorpyrifos Toxicity
In Urban Stormwater Runoff
Necessary Studies Have Not Been Done to Define Whether Toxicity or Potentially Toxic Concentrations of Diazinon or Chlorpyrifos Are Present in Urban Area Stormwater Runoff to Be Potentially Significantly Adverse to Designated Beneficial Uses of Various Receiving Waters
* This Area Needs Attention
Conclusions and Recommendations
California Urban Creeks and Some Parts of Rivers, Bays, Estuaries, Ponds and Lakes Are Experiencing Aquatic Life Toxicity Due to Urban and Some Agricultural Uses of Diazinon and Chlorpyrifos
Bailey, H.C., DiGiorgio, C., and Kroll, K., "Development of Procedures for Identifying Pesticide Toxicity in Ambient Waters: Carbofuran, Diazinon, Chlorpyrifos," Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 15(6): 837-845 (1996)
Connor, V., "Pesticide Toxicity in Urban Storm Runoff," Presentation to the Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board, Sacramento, CA, June (1995).
Cooper, A., "Diazinon in Urban Areas," Report of the Regional Water Quality Control Plant, Palo Alto, CA, August (1996).
de Vlaming, V., "Are Results of Single Species Toxicity Tests Reliable Predictors of Aquatic Ecosystem Community Response?" A Review, Presentation at the Southern California Toxic Assessment Group annual meeting, "Bridging the Gap Between Toxicity Testing and Environmental Impacts," San Pedro, CA, December 18, (1995).
de Vlaming, V., "Are the Results of Single Species Toxicity Tests Reliable Predictors of Aquatic Ecosystem Community Responses?" A Review, Report, Monitoring and Assessment Unit Division of Water Quality, State Water Resources Control Board, Sacramento, CA (1995).
Domagaiski, J.L., "Nonpoint Sources of Pesticides in the San Joaquin River, California: Input from Winter Storms," 1992-93, US Geological Survey Open-File Report 95-165, Sacramento, CA (1995).
Environment Canada, "Chromium and its Compounds," Environment Canada, PSL-39, Hull, Quebec, Canada (1995).
Foe, C., "Evaluation of the Potential Impact of Contaminants on Aquatic Resources in the Central Valley and Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta Estuary," Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board, Sacramento, CA, June (1995).
Foe, C., "Insecticide Concentrations and Invertebrate Bioassay Mortality in Agricultural Return Water From the San Joaquin Basin," Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board, Sacramento, CA, December (1995).
Foe, C., Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board, personnel communication to G. Fred Lee, Sacramento, CA, December (1996).
Grothe, D.R., Dickson, K.L. and Reed-Judkins, D.K, (eds), Whole Effluent Toxicity Testing: An Evaluation of Methods and Prediction of Receiving System Impacts, SETAC Press, Pensacola, FL (1996).
Hansen & Associates, "Identification and Control of Toxicity in Storm Water Discharges to Urban Creeks, Final Report," prepared for Alameda County Urban Runoff Clean Water Program, Hayward, CA, March (1995).
Katznelson, R., Mumley, T and Connor, V., "Diazinon in Surface Waters in the San Francisco Bay Area: Occurrence and Potential Impact--Draft Report," Report to California State Water Resources Control Board and Alameda Countywide Clean Water Program, Oakland, CA, May (1997).
Kuivila, K.M., "Diazinon Concentrations in the Sacramento and San Joaquin Rivers and San Francisco Bay, California, February 1993," US Geological Survey Water Facts Sheet, Open-File Report 93-440, Sacramento, CA (1993).
Kuivila, K.M. and Foe, C.G., "Concentrations, Transport, and Biological Effects of Dormant Spray Pesticides in the San Francisco Estuary, California," Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 14:1141-1150 (1995).
Lee, G.F. and Jones-Lee, A. "Evaluation Monitoring as an Alternative to Conventional Stormwater Runoff Monitoring and BMP Development," SETAC News 17(2):20-21 (1997).
Lee, G.F. and Jones-Lee, A, "Development and Implementation of Evaluation Monitoring for Stormwater Runoff Water Quality Impact, Assessment and Management," Report of G. Fred Lee & Associates, El Macero, CA, June (1997).
Lee, G.F. and Jones-Lee, A. "Chromium Speciation: Key to Reliable Control of Chromium Toxicity to Aquatic Life," To be presented at the American Chemical Society National Meeting, San Francisco, CA, April (1997).
Lee, G.F, Watson, R.A. and Taylor, S.M., "Evaluation Monitoring Program Baseline Implementation Project," In: Technical Appendices Runoff Management Plan for the Eastern Transportation Corridor, Volume 2, Silverado Constructors, Irvine, CA, February (1997).
Lewis, P.A., Klemm, D.J., Lazorchak, J.M., Norberg-King, T., Peltier, W.H., and Heber, M.A., "Short-Term Methods for Estimating the Chronic Toxicity of Effluents and Receiving Waters to Freshwater Organisms," Environmental Monitoring Systems Laboratory, Cincinnati, Ohio, Environmental Research Laboratory, Duluth, Minnesota, Region 4, Environmental Services Division, Athens, Georgia, Office of Water, Washington, D.C., Environmental Monitoring Systems Laboratory, Cincinnati, Office of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, Ohio (1994).
MacCoy, D., K.L. Crepeau, and K.M. Kuivila, "Dissolved Pesticide Data for the San Joaquin River at Vernalis and the Sacramento River at Sacramento, California, 1991-94," US Geological Survey Open-File Report 95-110, Sacramento, CA (1995).
Menconi, M. and Beckman, J., "Hazard Assessment of the Insecticide Methomy1 to Aquatic Organisms in the San Joaquin River System," Department of Fish and Game, Environmental Services Division, Pesticide Investigations Unit, Administrative Report 96-6, Rancho Cordova, CA, (1996).
Menconi, M. and Cox, C., "Hazard Assessment of the Insecticide Diazinon to Aquatic Organisms in the Sacramento-San Joaquin River System," California Fish and Game, Pesticide Investigations Unit, Environmental Services Division, Administrative Report 94-2, Rancho Cordova, CA (1994).
Menconi, M. and Paul, A., "Hazard Assessment of the Insecticide Chlorpyrifos to Aquatic Organisms in the Sacramento-San Joaquin River Systems," California Fish and Game, Pesticide Investigations Unit, Environmental Services Division, Administrative Report 94-1, Rancho Cordova, CA (1994).
Millipore, EnviroGard Diazinon Plate Kit ENVR POO 32, Millipore Corp., Bedford, MA, (1996).
Millipore, EnviroGard Chlorpyrifos Plate Kit ENVR POO 18, Millipore Corp., Bedford, MA, (1996).
Mount, D., ASCI Corp., Duluth, MN, Personal communication with G. Fred Lee, May (1997).
RMP, "San Francisco Bay Area Storm Water Runoff Monitoring Data Analysis, 1988-1995 Summary and Recommendations," Bay Area Stormwater Management Agencies Association as reported in Regional Monitoring Program for Trace Substances, 1995 Annual Report, San Francisco Estuary Institute, Berkeley, CA (1996).
Scanlin, J., "Characterization of Insecticide Use and Presence in the Castro Valley Creek Watershed Draft Report," Alameda County Flood Control and Water Conservation District, Oakland, CA (1997).
Taylor, S.M. and Lee, G.F., "Evaluation Monitoring Demonstration Project, Phase 1 Report," Report of Silverado Constructors, Irvine, CA, June (1997).
USGS, "Diazinon Concentrations in the Sacramento and San Joaquin Rivers and San Francisco Bay, California, February 1993, Water Fact Sheet," Open File Report 93-440, Department of the Interior, Sacramento, CA (1993).
Waller, W.T., Acevedo, M.F., Morgan, E.L, Dickson, K.L., Kennedy, J.H, Ammann, L.P., Allen, H.J., and Keating, P.R., "Biological and Chemical Testing in Storm Water," In: Stormwater NPDES Related Monitoring Needs, H.C. Torno (ed.), proc. Engineering Foundation Conference, August 1994, ASCE, New York (1995).
Woodward Clyde, "DUST Marsh Special Study, FY 92-93," Oakland, CA (1994).
Woodward-Clyde, "Sediment Diazinon Special Study," Report to Alameda Countywide Clean Water Program, Woodward-Clyde Consultants, Oakland, CA, December (1996)
Return to Landfills and Water Quality Management Home Page